The Twoness

African-American Literature

Wednesday, February 16, 2005

The Golden Age

DuBois would want cowboys to die.

I came to this idea while reading, of all things, this week’s LARP book, which is on the fast food industry and it’s impact on America. Don’t be amazed that a LARP book could actually enter into an intellectual discussion, here; after all, I’m one of the people who picked the thing, and you know what a snob I am. There was a chapter on the beef industry, the slow conglomeration of cattle ranches into cow mega-complexes which then sell their bovine bounty to the major fast food chains and supermarkets, cutting out the little guy. You know, that bold rugged individual so idolized and beloved by the American mindset. The author, Eric Schlosser, a journalist for Atlantic Monthly, bemoaned the loss of this culture, this individual who was truly in touch with nature, and all the simple and elegant beauty the lone rancher represents.

This is the kind of romanticized nonsense I’d expect from a New England urbanite.

The glorious and rugged lifestyle that Schlosser places on a marble pedestal is fully revealed by DuBois. The breathtakingly poor men and women, who are held to the land not through affection but through desperation, work the soil as well as they can but are continually looked down on by society, or held down forcibly by richer individuals. To put it simply, these people are fucking miserable, living the lives of “quiet desperation” which Thoreau described even before W.E.B. came along.

When DuBois spoke of the greatness of higher education, and how it leads to the advancement of the human intellect, he meant it. He had no delusions about the reality of Washington’s life-model, working the land for nothing but profit. He wanted better for not only his people, but for mankind. And now that the manner of killing yourself for crop production is fading, and is left in the hands of the few instead of the many, leaving a greater majority of people to pursue higher ideals and goals, half-wits like Schlosser come along and shed tears over its loss. There’s nothing romantic about tilling soil. It’s a necessity, and as glad as I am that there are people around who are willing to do it (perhaps some of your familes are among them), I am even more glad that our nation produces a massive surplus of food with less farmland than has ever been used before, leaving the former farmers to become current collegiates. This is the progress DuBois spoke of. This is improvement.

I can’t say for sure if any of this is right, or if I even believe half of it. But I’m bothered that what DuBois would have called “advancement” in 1903 is today called “progress” with a cynical intonation by an individual who owes his New York Times bestseller status to the very same consumer culture which he is condemning. If the lifestyle of “quiet desperation” is dying in America, it’s because there’s something better standing beyond it.

2 Comments:

  • At 11:36 AM, Blogger Not Scott said…

    Right, and I agree with Andy's sentiments about the hard life of a farming/ranching culture that is in danger of being romanticized. Certainly the work is difficult, messy and barely (or un-) profitable.

    But Andy's missing something about Schlosser's argument. Farming and Ranching don't have to be such a miserable existence. We err when we assume that the conditions of an agricultural-based lifestyle are inherently difficult. No, what makes the life of the contemporary farmer or rancher difficult is the culture that Schlosser dissects. The miniscule profits, the pathetic monetary value of a steer or corn or wheat is what makes farming and ranching a rough life. And these are socially constructed obstacles.

    Of the farmers and ranchers that I know (albeit likely a smaller sample than I'm comfortable extrapolating from) they want to be farmers. They want to keep working the land. They like cows. What they hate is a system that screws them over.

    I thought Andy was on the right track when he linked Schlosser's book with Du Bois noting the economic conditions that kept the black sharecropper or farmer down. I think he just misses the larger critique. That the economic conditions imposed on farmers needs to change--become more fair and humanitarian.

     
  • At 2:13 PM, Blogger Andy said…

    We're talking about me in the third person now? Yeesh, and here I thought we had something special, Scott. I can see we've grown apart. Any more of this, and I'll give the ring back.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home